Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

House Judiciary Probes Climate Action 100+ Members as ESG Investigation Continues

The House Judiciary Committee sent letters to more than 130 U.S.-based companies, retirement systems and government pension funds that are members of Climate Action 100+, questioning their involvement in the group, the committee announced Tuesday.

In addition to asking for the organizations’ documents on their ESG goals, involvement in the climate coalition and communications with other member institutions, the letters inquire about the entities’ plans to incorporate Climate Action 100+’s “Phase Two” requirements announced in June 2023.

The questioning is part of the committee’s years-long probe into whether antitrust laws currently serve “to deter anticompetitive collusion to promote ESG-related goals.” In June, the committee published an interim report accusing climate groups and activists of “colluding” on decarbonization, a claim witnesses denied at a hearing the following day.

Find out more here.

Leave a comment